Democrats Bank On Angry
Written by JB Williams
The progressive lamestream press says that
democrats are poised to regain political power this November, for the first
time since removed from power in 1994. Conservatives across this land are
worried that they could wake up to Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House and/or
Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. Something worthy of worry for sureÖ
But Democrats know a few things that many conservatives fail to grasp.
win in November to avoid a complete collapse of their Party.
Democrats canít win
without the help of Republican voters.
Secular Socialist Democrats
control the DNC, but are a small voting minority.
For Democrats to win, Republicans must stay home or defect.
only win by default.
For Republican voters to help Democrats into power, they must be
tricked into helping. No conservative could ever vote for a modern secular
socialist democrat, so their vote must be against something else.
Thereís no getting around the fact that very real Bush
administration failures such as inadequate border security, continued illegal
immigration, record social spending and a stumbling commitment to victory in
Iraq has left the door wide open for Democrats to regain power. However, there
is a bit more to it than that.
In order for conservative voters to defect, or even stay home, they
must believe that Democrats would do it all better!
Now even the most naÔve conservative could never believe such a thing.
Democrats are the social spending experts. Even though Bush has outspent all
previous administrations, Democrats are campaigning on the notion that he still
didnít spend enough.
Although Democrats attack Bushís lack-luster border security,
they campaign on the notion that there isnít even any such thing as
illegal immigration, seeing no difference between legal immigrants and illegal
immigrants. They even campaign on promises of federal handouts and civil rights
for illegal immigrants and open borders period.
And though few Americans feel like we are being ďall we can
beĒ in Iraq,
conservatives are angered that we have not lowered the boom in Iraq,
not that we have failed to cut-n-run!
Itís a case of does two wrongs make a right? Conservatives
unhappy with the Bush administration are looking for someone more conservative,
not secular socialists even further left than Bush and Co.
In a presidential election, a minority party can win by simply
recruiting a strong third party conservative that will divide the conservative
vote, creating a numerical majority win by default. In 1992, it was Ross Perot
who provided that divide, leaving Democrats in a functioning majority, even
though Clinton was
elected by substantially less than 50% of the popular vote. Perot provided the
divide again in 1996 and Clinton
won again with less than 50% of the popular vote.
But in a congressional mid-term election, it isnít quite that
simple. They have to win more than one race. They must divide a nation, not a
voting bloc. They canít win by third party divisions. They must win one
race at a time, one district at a time, in multiple districts in order to shift
the balance of power nationally.
To do this, they need mass numbers of opposition voters to either stay
home or defect. Not defect to a third party alternative, but all the way to the
other side. While many angry conservatives might like to vote against liberal
republicans this fall, any vote against a liberal republican is in fact a vote
for a socialist democrat. Voters must defect from the right, all the way to the
The notion of any middle ground should be effectively put to rest by
now. Show me a moderate in either political camp, and Iíll show you a
politician without power. You wonít even recognize their name. They are
sidelined, sitting on the bench, ineffective and unable to make any difference
at all. They are waiting for their term to end to go home or planning their
defection to an Independent status, like Joe Lieberman.
So the question isnít - are conservatives less than impressed
with the current republican leadership. The question is Ė are they angry
enough to defect all the way to the dark side? Are they disenchanted enough to
stay home in November, handing victory to their arch enemy on the left by
Democrats and their lamestream press are clearly banking on
disenchanted conservative voters this fall. Without the help of angry
conservatives, democrats have no chance of regaining power.
Will their efforts to paint every republican a pervert via the Foley
case work? Will they be able to convince pro-life, pro-military, pro-security,
pro-sovereignty and pro-capitalism conservatives to stay home or vote for a
secular socialist? I just donít see it happeningÖ
A drive up the road will convince you that conservatives are not happy
with their current leadership. Most of the yards usually proud to display their
party campaign signs are empty this year. But even though they donít have
the typical campaign signs in the yard, the same principles are still in their
hearts and still on their minds. Come Election Day, sign or no sign, they will
be in the voting booth and they wonít be pulling the lever for people
they have fought against all their lives.
Progressive political operatives masquerading as news anchors can
predict all they want on the basis of their slanted polling results or the
signs they see in the yards across America.
But they can not predict how people will vote when they step into the booth and
face the decision available, semi-liberal republican leadership or full-blown
Conservatives are not known for their ignorance, nor are they known for
being passive by nature. They donít usually march in parades, attend
sit-ins or burn flags to make their point. They go to the polls at election time
and make their statement. They are often referred to as the silent majority
because they are usually too busy with productive lives to sit around
pontificating with their liberal friends. But that silent majority has been
speaking loud and clear in every election since 1994, and I donít expect
that to change this November!
Conservatives have nothing to fear but their own apathy or appetite for
vengeance. If they vote, they win!